Datingforbigots com adult cam chat chat dating live video web
It doesn't help that there's a large, wimpy middle of people who aren't overtly marriage bigots, but who whine about how They should just call it something other than marriage.
John Scalzi | June 5, 2006 PM Mythago: "But c'mon, these are people dumb enough be marriage bigots in the first place." Well, two things.
There's a manifest difference in a debate which has as its founding proposition that same-sex marriage is a theoretical construct in the US -- which is the proposition marriage bigots want to promote -- and the debate which has as its founding proposition that same-sex marriages are already here, and there thousands of them.
And then we need to ask the people "who don't know what they think about it" if they want to align themselves with people who want to destroy actual marriages in order to "preserve" a definition of marriage that doesn't actually exist.Look: anyone who wants to destroy marriages should not get the high ground in the marriage debate. The marriage bigots want to destroy the marriages of thousands of Americans. More seriously, until it can be shown how legal marriage between two adults in any way causes me harm, I say let love rule.Until then, they should just follow the bible on this...This should eliminate the "separate but unequal" argument.It is unfair for the minority to impose its value system on the majority, but it is similary unfair for the majority to penalize the minority viewpoint. John Scalzi | June 6, 2006 AM Brad Selbst: "Marriage, as it is conventionally defined, is between a man and a woman." So what? "It doesn't make everybody who believes that a bigot." Indeed it does not.